CityStructure - Feasibility Study simplified
SIDE Inc.

SIDE Inc.

How Realtors are affected by NAR's Settlement Agreement of $418 Million for Commission Claims

A prominent real estate organization has agreed to lower commissions, marking a notable change in the industry. This decision, stemming from accusations of antitrust violations against the National Association of Realtors (NAR), alters how commissions are structured and mandates written contracts between agents and clients. As a result, buyer's agents must now showcase their worth to potential homebuyers in a market undergoing commission adjustments.

What is the Lawsuit about?

The legal action directed at the National Association of Realtors (NAR) is centered on allegations of antitrust breaches related to the association's guidelines regarding real estate agent commissions. Specifically, a collective of Missouri homeowners contended that NAR's regulations enforced excessive fees for agents, notably concerning the commission paid to buyer's agents. These alleged practices, as per the lawsuit, were deemed violations of federal antitrust legislation. Consequently, the lawsuit aimed to obtain damages from NAR, potentially amounting to triple damages reaching up to $5.4 billion.

What changes are being made to the NAR’s rules?

Listing agents are now barred from utilizing the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) to present commissions to buyer’s agents. Consequently, they are no longer able to delineate commissions for buyer's agents via the MLS. Agents representing buyers must now engage in written agreements with homebuyers, explicitly outlining service charges. This measure ensures transparent communication regarding agent service fees to potential homebuyers.

When will the new NAR rules take effect?

The new rules are anticipated to go into effect in the middle of July.

How the verdict and NAR settlement are affecting home sellers?

The recent legal settlements between the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and homeowners regarding agent commissions present both potential benefits and challenges for home sellers. On the positive side, economists predict a significant decrease in commissions by up to 30%, which could translate to lower closing costs for sellers. This represents a substantial financial advantage, making home selling potentially more affordable.

However, the impact on selling prices is a matter of debate. While lower commissions could incentivize sellers to reduce listing prices, some experts believe sellers may choose to absorb the cost savings as increased profit. This could lead to a scenario where sellers benefit from lower closing costs without a significant change in overall market prices.

How the verdict and NAR settlement are affecting buyers' agents?

The problem is that the buyers would have to pay out of their pocket the commission because the lenders won't cover this expense. This can go two ways: buyers will take on the search for a property to avoid paying the commission or the buyers' agents have to prove the value they bring to the buyers a lot more than gating information about the property. Even though the value of having a person negotiate and draft transition documents on a buyer's behalf is valuable, buyers don't understand this value until they decide to make an offer on a property and have to deal with the headache of negotiating price and purchasing conditions for a property.

The buyer's agent problem is that it'll be hard to demonstrate value to a buyer until the actual transaction takes place. This triggers a much more comprehensive marketing package that a Buyer's agent has to prepare to attract buyers. A competitive advantage has been proven when Buyer's agents present insightful analysis about the possible options to improve and add value to the property after purchasing it.

Listing agents and home sellers use CityStructure Analysis to sell at the best price.

How the verdict and NAR settlement are affecting the real estate properties' value?

Some experts predict a decrease due to the potential reduction in selling costs, particularly the buyer's agent commission. Their logic suggests that without this cost factored into valuations, sellers might be incentivized to lower prices. However, opposing viewpoints, like that of REDFIN CEO Glenn Kelman, argue for possible stability. This perspective highlights that historical valuations already considered the seller's cost of the buyer's agent commission. Consequently, sellers might not adjust prices downward simply because the commission is no longer explicitly paid. This scenario could lead to sellers pocketing the difference that previously went to the buyer's agent, potentially inflating the final sale price. Additionally, questions linger about how long sellers can maintain potentially inflated prices without adjusting to market realities. Furthermore, the current high interest rates might influence buyer affordability, impacting overall demand.

Wonder how much money you could make if you'd improve your property?